![]() ![]() I argue that the notion already appears in Brouwer's lecture. In this new paper, I add to this historical evidence (ignored in biographies of Wittgenstein) that Wittgenstein and Brouwer met afterwards, and then discuss a further topic, Wittgenstein's peculiar notion of 'hypothesis', which played, as I argued in my 1998 book, a key role in the 'middle period'. ![]() This approach leads to new conclusions concerning the topics just mentioned. Ludwig Wittgenstein, especially his first book. At the root of Wittgensteins thought, Monk argues, is a determination to resist the scientism characteristic of our age, a. I then emphasized the role of Brouwer's 1928 lecture in Vienna that Wittgenstein attended and rejected the anachronistic type of analysis that uses his later views to dismiss it as irrelevant in light of Wittgenstein's later views: he was not in command of them in 1928 and it is only exegetical common sense to assume that it was the author of the Tractatus who listened to that lecture. Your book, Wittgenstein Kite, takes a novel approach to understanding the work of. pdf file size 2,82 MB added by Apfelshorle. 103-127) where I discussed substantive points of contact between Wittgenstein and intuitionism, e.g., the role of intuition in mathematics, rule-following, choice sequences, the Law of Excluded Middle, and the primacy of arithmetic over logic. This paper is a follow up of sorts to my earlier piece 'Wittgenstein and Brouwer' (Synthese, vol. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |